Image Source: http://peak360fitness.com/wod-survey-says
I remember having an argument with someone about a health
fact. It was something that was well
known and time seemed to only solidify the proof that it was true. But this individual, in an effort to play
devil’s advocate, decided he wanted to disagree with it and sent me a link to a
“study” that proved it wrong. I took one
glance at who wrote it and completely shot him down. I said, “This isn’t even a credible
source. It’s some Joe Shmo’s
opinion. He has no credentials to back
him up.” He couldn’t argue with
that. It surprised me that someone who
claimed to be very educated would attempt to prove his point with something so
weak.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned about the social sciences
during my studies, it’s that you can’t rely too heavily on just any scientific
research evidence that is out there. It
is important to read those studies with scrutiny. (Hawkins, Dollahite, & Draper, 2012)
The first time a professor told me this, I have to admit it
was very disheartening. I had always
felt better when my personal beliefs were backed up by some scientific study. It almost felt like nothing could be for
certain now. If we couldn’t count on
science, then what was the point of studying all of this?
While not all studies have solid findings, some still give
us a pretty good idea to go off of. We
can still use the better studies to make an educated guess in our decisions. That being said, it is important to remember
that scientists do not study moral agency.
“Social scientists study the outward manifestations of behavior, the
inner workings of the mind, and the contexts in which beliefs, attitudes, and
behaviors are forged. The observation
that much human behavior appears to be following predictable scripts does not
obviate agency.”- Thomas W. Draper, professor in the School of Family Life at
Brigham Young University (Hawkins, Dollahite, & Draper, 2012)
So how can you tell if a study is better than others? The first thing I do is look at where it came
from and who wrote it, like in my example above. If they have no credentials to back them up
then don’t even waste your time reading it. (Hawkins, Dollahite, & Draper, 2012)
The better studies are also those that can be repeated over
and over with similar results. For
example, you might remember hearing of a study that supposedly proved that
there was a “gay gene”. The trouble came
when no one could replicate the results.
Unfortunately many people still weigh heavily on this study that only
proved to be a very weak theory. (Hawkins, Dollahite, & Draper, 2012)
Finally you have to take into account the human factor. All studies are done by humans and therefore
are flawed. There is no such thing as a
perfect study. (Hawkins, Dollahite, & Draper, 2012)
So be careful. When you
hear of a new scientific study, be smart and do your own research before you
just believe anything you see or hear. Especially before you try to prove any points with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment